![]()
It’s old, and currently it’s relatively slow and sluggish. The key is to work smarter, even if it involves jumping through hoops.Īfter Effects is not perfect. In some cases, a few simple steps can result in dramatic speed improvements but it requires re-thinking the way you use After Effects. There are plenty of other ways to make After Effects work faster – but it involves extra work for the user. Spending money is easy if you have it, but it’s not the only avenue to better performance. If happiness is faster After Effects renders then sorry, money will only get you so far. You can spend lots of money on a “God box” but After Effects simply doesn’t utilize all of the power available. #Frischluft lenscare after effects cs6 free download series#It’s where this series began: the observation that a MacPro doesn’t render After Effects projects faster than an iMac that costs 1/3 the price. Unlike a 3D renderer, with After Effects a cheaper CPU with a higher clock speed will render faster than a more expensive CPU that has more cores. After Effects just doesn’t utilise multiple CPU cores, instead it’s more responsive to clock speeds. The issue isn’t Intel vs AMD, it’s After Effects vs multi-threading. If we were comparing VRay renders then it would be a completely different story. This is only true for After Effects – I’m not claiming that the Intel CPU is better or faster than the AMD one overall. If you’re building a rig for After Effects and After Effects only, then the Intel i9 10900K is going to provide faster After Effects rendering for a much lower cost than an AMD 3990x. More importantly, it’s only $1,000 – 1/4 the price of AMD’s flagship. A few months ago, Intel announced a new “Core i9 10900K”, and although it only has 10 cores as opposed to AMDs 64, it offers a boosted clock speed up to 5.3 GHz. However the base clock speed is 2.9 GHz, and After Effects simply won’t use most of those cores. As After Effects performs better with higher clock speeds than it does with a higher core-count, a cheaper CPU with a higher clock speed will provide better performance for a lower cost.Ī quick look on Google suggests that AMD’s most expensive processor is the 3990x, offering 64 cores for about $4,000. The most expensive CPUs have the most cores but they run at slower clock speeds, however it’s possible to buy cheaper CPUs with fewer cores running at higher clock speeds. This is what we covered in part 5 & part 6: After Effects is predominately single-threaded, and so its performance is governed mostly by CPU clock speed.īut modern CPUs have focused on more CPU cores, not faster ones. #Frischluft lenscare after effects cs6 free download software#In fact – without 3rd party rendering software – it’s possible that a more expensive CPU will render After Effects compositions (slightly) slower than a cheaper model. We can buy the most expensive CPU and GPU on the market and it won’t make our renders noticeably faster than a much cheaper computer. All we have to do is spend the money.īut when we get to After Effects it’s a different story – at least it is at the moment, in 2020. For real-time 3D games, a more expensive GPU renders a higher number of frames-per-second (unless you’re talking Quadros). ![]() If we look at CPU-based 3D rendering, then spending more money for more CPU cores definitely makes the rendering process faster. It’s a fair assumption that if slow performance is the problem, then spending more money can solve it. If we compare cheaper computers to more expensive ones then we expect to see faster performance for our money. It’s just throwing money at the problem, which is easy if you have the money. If we don’t feel like cooking, we can eat out and pay someone else to cook for us, and if we do cook at home then we can buy a dishwasher to do the dishes. Now they’re selling us robot vacuum cleaners so we don’t even need to do the vacuuming. Initially they sold us vacuum cleaners so we didn’t need to physically beat carpets and rugs. ![]() Convincing people to spend money so we don’t have to work as hard keeps the advertising industry busy. ![]() In this article I’m going to look at how changing your workflow and project settings can significantly improve the performance of After Effects, in most cases without spending anything at all. In Part 1 of this series, I said that there’s a point where spending more money won’t make After Effects render any faster, and while that’s generally true for multi-core CPUs and GPUs, there are other avenues for performance gains that don’t involve money. Plenty of people have said that money can’t buy you happiness, and anyone who says it can hasn’t used After Effects. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |